Skip to content Skip to footer

Controversial Churchill Portrait from “The Crown” Up for Auction

A portrait of Winston Churchill, famously featured in the popular Netflix series “The Crown,” is set to go under the hammer, sparking considerable interest and debate within the art community and beyond. The painting, which has become a subject of controversy and fascination, will be auctioned soon, drawing attention from collectors, historians, and fans of the show alike.

The Portrait’s History

The portrait in question is a depiction of Sir Winston Churchill by the artist Graham Sutherland. Commissioned by the British Parliament in 1954 to commemorate Churchill’s 80th birthday, the artwork was intended to honor one of Britain’s most iconic leaders. However, the portrait was met with disdain by Churchill himself and his wife, Clementine. They believed the painting was unflattering and failed to capture Churchill’s character and spirit.

The Controversy

The painting’s portrayal in “The Crown” brought renewed attention to its controversial history. In the series, the tension between Churchill and Sutherland is dramatized, highlighting the stark difference in perception between the artist and his subject. Churchill’s vehement dislike of the portrait led to its eventual destruction; it is widely believed that Clementine Churchill had the painting burned shortly after its completion.

This act of destruction only added to the painting’s notoriety, making it a symbol of artistic interpretation clashing with public and personal image. The story as depicted in “The Crown” reignited debates about artistic freedom, historical representation, and the complex legacy of public figures.

The Study’s Journey to Auction

While the original portrait was destroyed in a fire, a study of Churchill by Sutherland survived. This study, offering a more intimate and relaxed depiction, is currently on display at Blenheim Palace and is set to be auctioned by Sotheby’s. Estimated to fetch up to £800,000 ($997,000), the study has garnered significant attention, partly due to its portrayal in popular culture. “Following the episode of ‘The Crown’ and Gary Oldman’s portrayal of Churchill in ‘Darkest Hour,’ we have seen new collectors entering the market looking for Churchill paintings,” said Bryn Sayles, Head of Sale, Modern & Post-War British Art at Sotheby’s.

The Auction

The upcoming auction of this controversial portrait has generated significant buzz. The painting, or rather its only surviving preparatory sketches and studies, will be the centerpiece of the Sotheby’s auction. Art collectors and history enthusiasts view it as a rare opportunity to own a piece of history that encapsulates a dramatic episode in the life of Winston Churchill and the broader cultural narrative of post-war Britain.

The Sotheby’s auction house overseeing the sale has underscored the significance of the portrait in comprehending mid-20th century British art and politics. They anticipate bids ranging between 500,000 and 800,000 GBP from a diverse array of interested parties, encompassing private collectors, museums, and potentially institutions associated with Churchill’s legacy.

Andre Zlattinger, Sotheby’s head of modern British and Irish art, remarked that in the surviving study, “Churchill is caught in a moment of absent-minded thoughtfulness, and together with the backstory of its creation, it gives the impression of a man truly concerned with his image.”

Sotheby’s has placed the painting on public display in the very room where Churchill was born 150 years ago at Blenheim Palace, a stately country mansion located 60 miles (100 kilometers) northwest of London. Visitors have the opportunity to view it there until Sunday. Following this, the painting will be exhibited at Sotheby’s offices in New York from May 3 to 16, and later in London from May 25 to June 5.

Artistic and Historical Significance

The portrait’s significance extends beyond its controversial reception. Graham Sutherland, an acclaimed modernist painter, brought his distinctive style to the portrait, capturing not just Churchill’s physical likeness but also his weariness and the weight of his years in leadership. The stark, almost brutal realism of the painting was a departure from the more heroic and idealized depictions of Churchill, making it a poignant commentary on the realities of power and aging.

Conclusion

The auction of the Churchill portrait from “The Crown” represents more than just a sale of a piece of art; it is a moment that captures the intersection of history, art, and popular culture. As the painting heads to auction, it will undoubtedly continue to spark discussions about the role of art in documenting and interpreting history, the legacy of Winston Churchill, and the enduring power of storytelling in shaping our understanding of the past.

Whether viewed as a masterpiece of modern art or a controversial misrepresentation, the portrait remains a powerful symbol of the complex interplay between artist, subject, and society. The auction will be a significant event for all those interested in the rich tapestry of history and art.

 

Download Hi Resolution of the Winston Churchill’s infamous portrait, (4096x4949pixels, 5 MB)

Go to Top